MEMORIES

Originally posted Thursday, September 24th, 2015

(Sermon for First Evening of Rosh Hashanah, September 13, 2015)

Tonight is Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year 5776.  The words Rosh Hashanah literally mean “Head of the Year,” in the sense of the “start of the year.”  However, in the traditional liturgy for this holiday, the name more commonly applied to it is Yom Hazikaron/ The day of Remembrance.

There are many ways in which our tradition addresses us with the command:  “Zachor!” / “Remember!”

The Fourth of the Ten Commandments calls upon us to “Remember the Sabbath Day” / “Zachor et Yom Hashabbat.”

The Shabbat evening kiddush describes the Sabbath as “zikaron lema’asey vereyshit” (“a remembrance of the work of creation”) and zecher litziat mitzrayim” (“a remembrance of the exodus from Egypt”).

The mitzvah of eating matzah on Passover is explained in Deuteronomy 16:3 as being “lem’an tizkor et yom tzetkha meyeretz mitzrayim kawl yimei chayekha”/ “so that you will remember the day of your departure from the land of Egypt all the days of your life.”     

Indeed, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel goes so far as to assert that: “Judaism does not command us to believe; it commands us to remember.”  (quoted in Kol Haneshama Machzor, p. 648) 

But our capacity as human beings to store up important information in our individual memories is limited. What if we can’t remember?

A well-known Chasidic tale addresses this question.  As recounted by Elie Wiesel in his book The Gates of the Forest, the tale goes like this:

“[Once upon a time], when the great Baal Shem-Tov saw misfortune threatening the Jews it was his custom to go into a certain part of the forest to meditate. There he would light a fire, say a special prayer, and the miracle would be accomplished and the misfortune averted.

“Later, when his disciple, the celebrated Maggid of Mezritch, had occasion, for the same reason, to intercede with heaven, he would go to the same place in the forest and say: ‘Master of the Universe, listen! I do not know how to light the fire, but I still know how to say the prayer.’ And again the miracle would be accomplished.

“Still later, Rabbi Moshe-Leib of Sasov, in order to save his people once more, would go into the forest and say: ‘I do not know how to light the fire, I do not know the prayer, but I know the place and this must be sufficient.’ It was sufficient and the miracle was accomplished.

“Then it fell to Rabbi Israel of Rizhyn to overcome misfortune. Sitting in his armchair, his head in his hands, he spoke to God: ‘I am unable to light the fire and I do not know the prayer; I cannot even find the place in the forest. All I can do is to tell the story, and this must be sufficient.’ And it was sufficient.”[1]

A story like that acknowledges what we all know to be true – that even when the passage of time distances us from important events, we can still keep alive the lessons learned from those events through the act of remembering them. 

I experienced this first hand a number of years ago, back in 2003 to be specific.   That July, while I was visiting friends in New York City during my summer vacation, I went back to Coney Island, the neighborhood in Brooklyn where I had lived from the time I was four years old until just before I turned 12.  My family had moved out to the suburbs of Long Island in 1973, and I had last visited Coney Island in 1983.  So this 2003 visit was the first time I had set foot there in 20 years. 

This time around, I walked along the Boardwalk that I had played on as a child; past the elementary school I had attended; past the high-rise building on Surf Avenue where my family had lived in a tenth-floor apartment overlooking the Cyclone and the Wonder Wheel; past Sea Breeze Jewish Center where I had gone to Hebrew school.

Everything seemed in a certain way familiar. 

And yet, walking those streets again after so many years I felt like a ghost.  Or like an actor on the set of a play authored by someone else.  Or like someone walking in a dream being dreamt by someone else.  So much time had passed that I no longer actually remembered living in that neighborhood.  What I remembered was the remembering itself.

I’ve heard it said that after a certain amount of time, all the cells in our body gradually get replaced so that, physically, we become entirely new people even in the course of the same earthly lifetime.

That’s sort of what the experience of visiting Coney Island was like that summer afternoon in 2003.  It was as if some other person – coincidentally named David Steinberg – had been the one who had lived there.

With the increasing distance of the passing of the years, memory of the actual experience had evolved into memory of the memory. 

And that, as it turns out, is sufficient.  I may no longer have visceral memories of being a little boy in Brooklyn, but I have narrative memories of it.  Because I have rehearsed and retold the tale, they are now a part of me.   The elementary-school aged boy David Steinberg is still the same person as the grown-up David Steinberg who is now well into middle age – even if the two do not share any of the same cells.

What works on the level of the individual also works on the larger level of the Jewish people.  Because we have rehearsed and retold the tales of our people, they are now a part of us.  You or I may not have physically left Egypt on the first Passover, or physically stood at Sinai on the first Shavuot, or endured the Babylonian exile after the destruction of the first Temple, or physically celebrated with the Maccabees in the rededicated second Temple at the first Chanukah.  And most of us did not personally endure the living hell of the Nazi concentration camps, or physically dance in the streets of Tel Aviv in 1948 on the first Yom Ha-Atzma’ut.[2]

Yet spiritually we have all experienced this and more.

For we are the same nation, the same people, the same Ahm Yisrael – even though we have been dispersed around the globe, and even though our customs, our theologies, and our worldviews have evolved and continue to evolve over the course of the centuries.  The details change but the identity remains – encompassed by a single narrative, a communal story, whose words we ourselves write as we live our lives as Jews.

But Rosh Hashanah as Yom Hazikaron/The Day of Remembrance is not just about OUR efforts to remember people and events of the past.  It is also about our faith in GOD’S limitless capacity to remember us.  For even when the ground under our feet seems unstable and the passage of time seems to rush by out of control --- our tradition teaches that God, as it were, understands the larger picture, as the words of Psalm 90 declare:  “ki elef shanim be’eynekha keyom etmol ki ya’avor, v’ashmurah valaylah.”/ “For in Your sight a thousand years are like yesterday that has passed, like a watch in the night.” (Ps. 90:4).

The scriptural readings for the first day of Rosh Hashanah echo the theme of God’s capacity for remembering us:  Tomorrow morning’s Torah reading from Genesis 21 opens with the words “Vadonai pakad et Sarah” / “Adonai remembered Sarah”.  And the Haftarah from the First Book of Samuel referring to Hannah says “vayizkereha adonai”/ “Adonai remembered her.” 

On Yom Kippur, the most important part of the day for many worshippers is the Yizkor service, which takes its name from the first words of the individual meditation recited at that service – “Yizkor elohim nishmot yakiray”/ “May God remember the souls of my dear ones.”

Throughout the ten day period that begins with Rosh Hashanah and ends with Yom Kippur, we insert into the Amidah a plea asking God “zochreinu lechayyim”/ “Remember us for life.”

And an entire section of the Rosh Hashanah daytime prayers is entitled“zichronot” – quotations from the Bible on the theme of God’s remembrance.  In each of these biblical quotations the idea seems to be that to remember a person is to remember the relationship that you have with them.  

I think the most poignant example of this connection between remembrance and relationship is a verse from the Book of Jeremiah quoted in the traditional Rosh Hashanah zichronot liturgy – “Koh amar Adonai, Zacharti Lakh chesed ne’urayikh, ahavat kelulotayikh, lechteykh acharai bamidbar be’eretz lo zeruah”   (“Thus says the Eternal, ‘I remember the devotion of your youth, the love of your bridal days, how you followed me through the wilderness, through a land unsown.” [Jeremiah 2:2]) [A paraphrase of this verse can be found in your machzor on the bottom of page 205.]

We see here a concept of relationship that involves mutuality, loyalty and commitment through both good times and bad.  To use religious terminology, what we are talking about here is “brit” or “covenant.”

Our tradition teaches that God maintains a covenental relationship with the Jewish people:  “v’zacharti lahem brit rishonim…”  (“I shall remember for their sake the covenant of former generations, whom I brought forth from the land of Egypt in the eyes of all the nations to become their God, I the Eternal.” [Lev. 26:45])

And the prayers of the machzor affirm as well God’s covenantal relationship with all of humanity:  “V’gam et Noach b’ahava zachartavatafkideyhu bidvar yeshuah v’rachamim…”  (“And so with love did You remember Noah, and appoint him for a fate of mercy and redemption… Because of the memory of Noah that came before you, Adonai, you made his descendants as numerous as the dust of the earth, as the sand of the sea.”)

This day is a day for zikaron/remembrance.  May we remember this Rosh Hashanah the blessings we have experienced and continue to experience; the love we give and receive; and the divine power that abides with us through it all as we strive to be better people in the year to come. 

Zochreinu Lechayim/ May God remember us for life on this Yom Hazikaron.

Shanah tovah u’metukah/ A good and sweet year to one and all.

 

(c) Rabbi David Steinberg 5776/2015

 

 

[1] http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/080521044X?ie=UTF8&tag=storylovers-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=080521044X

[2] Israel Independence Day.

Posted on April 13, 2016 .

CHOOSING A LEADER

Originally posted Monday, August 24th, 2015

[Dvar Torah for Parashat Shofetim (Deut. 16:18 = 21:9) given at Temple Israel, Duluth on 8/21/15]

One of the most striking peculiarities of our American way of life is the length of our presidential election campaigns.  The next presidential election is still over fourteen months away.  And yet the campaigns for the Democratic and Republican nominations have already been in full swing for many months.  

Perhaps that’s simply a function of the fact that we elect our President separately from electing our federal legislators.   In most democratic countries, voters vote for a political party on the local or national level.  Then the leader of the party with the most seats in the legislature forms the government.  If they have a president or a hereditary monarch as a separate head of state, then he or she serves a mainly honorific function as a symbol of national unity with no significant political power. 

By contrast, here in the United States we elect an individual rather than simply voting for a political party platform.  So maybe as a result, we get a longer campaign because it takes more time to judge the character of a person than it takes to judge the merits of a political party platform. 

This week’s Torah portion offers some guidance on what we ought to look for in a national leader.  As we learn in Parashat Shofetim, in Deuteronomy 17: 14-20:

14 If, after you have entered the land that the Eternal your God has assigned to you, and taken possession of it and settled in it, you decide, "I will set a king over me, as do all the nations about me," 15 you shall be free to set a king over yourself, one chosen by the Eternal your God. Be sure to set as king over yourself one of your own people; you must not set a foreigner over you, one who is not your kin. 16 Moreover, he shall not have for himself too many horses or send people back to Egypt to add to his horses, since the Eternal has warned you, "You must not go back that way again." 17 And he shall not have for himself too many wives, lest his heart go astray; nor shall he greatly increase for himself silver and gold to excess.

18 When he is seated on his royal throne, he shall have a copy of this Torah written for him on a scroll by the levitical priests. 19 Let it remain with him and let him read in it all his life, so that he may learn to revere the Eternal his God, to observe faithfully every word of this Torah as well as these laws. 20 Thus he will not act haughtily toward his fellows or deviate from the Mitzvah to the right or to the left, to the end that he and his descendants may reign long in the midst of Israel.

We see here a generally apologetic attitude about having a monarch in the first place.  It would appear that, in an ideal world, there would be no intermediary between the people and God.  Everyone would live in harmony with one another and the world under a shared sense of ethical purpose-- without any need for strong central government as personified by a king. 

Of course, that’s not the world we live in.  And so we find in our tradition such philosophical gems as Rabbi Chanina’s teaching in Pirke Avot 3:2, הוי מתפלל בשלומה של מלכות--שאלמלא מוראה, איש את ריעהו חיים בלעו. (“Pray for the welfare of the government, for were it not for fear of it, people would swallow each other alive.”)

The Torah’s warning that a national leader not acquire too many horses, or wives, or riches hints at a critique of King Solomon --- who was guilty of all these sins and whose kingdom split in two following his death. 

As for us, if we try to put it into contemporary terms, the parasha reminds us of the danger of political corruption.  Essentially, we need to seek leaders who are in it out of a sense of service and not out of self-centered craving for power, riches and fame. 

But I’ve long been somewhat idealistic about those who run for political office.   Whether I agree with a particular candidate’s views or not, whether I consider a particular candidate’s personal and professional qualifications to be adequate or not, I usually take at face value that they are in the race out of an honest desire to be of service to society.

Because, REALLY, especially in the political culture of the United States with its campaign seasons that last for years on end --- who in their right mind could honestly want to go through such exhaustion and endless scrutiny if not in service of one’s ideals?  I can’t possibly imagine that being a candidate for office could be fun – no matter what any of the candidates might say publicly.  It’s a sacrificial offering of themselves in the hope that they might be given the opportunity to attempt to make society a better place --  by being elected to a leadership role that would enable them to push forward with their political program.

And so, let us be thankful for those who step forward as candidates and offer up our prayers for their physical and emotional health--- both those whom we would vote for and support as well as those whom we would vociferously oppose.

Shabbat shalom.

 

(c) Rabbi David Steinberg 5775/2015

Posted on April 13, 2016 .

PURSUING PEACE WITH IRAN

Originally posted Tuesday July 28th, 2015

Thoughts on Devarim/Shabbat Chazon (5775/2015)

(Deut. 3:23 – 7:11)

[Edited version of Dvar Torah given at Temple Israel on Friday evening 7/24/15] 

This Shabbat is traditionally known as Shabbat Chazon – “The Sabbath of the Vision” after the first phrase in tomorrow morning’s Haftarah:

א  חֲזוֹן, יְשַׁעְיָהוּ בֶן-אָמוֹץ, אֲשֶׁר חָזָה, עַל-יְהוּדָה וִירוּשָׁלִָם--בִּימֵי עֻזִּיָּהוּ יוֹתָם אָחָז יְחִזְקִיָּהוּ, מַלְכֵי יְהוּדָה.

1 The vision of Isaiah the son of Amoz, which he saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem, in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.

ב  שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמַיִם וְהַאֲזִינִי אֶרֶץ, כִּי יְהוָה דִּבֵּר:  בָּנִים גִּדַּלְתִּי וְרוֹמַמְתִּי, וְהֵם פָּשְׁעוּ בִי.

2 Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth, for the Eternal has spoken: Children I have reared, and brought up, and they have rebelled against Me.

(Isaiah 1: 1-2)

We read these words in the haftarah tomorrow morning because this is the Shabbat immediately preceding the observance of Tisha B’Av, the 9th of Av.  The Mishnah teaches that the 9th of Av was the date of a whole slew of calamities in Jewish history, including the destruction of both the first Temple by the Babylonians in 586 BCE and the second Temple by the Romans in 70 CE.  Indeed, this Shabbat is the climax of a series of the three Shabbatot known as Tlata Depuranuta  (“The Three [Sabbaths] of Rebuke”).

Next Shabbat, the first Shabbat that comes after Tisha B’Av,  begins the new cycle of Sheva DeNechemta (“The Seven Sabbaths of Consolation”), leading up to Rosh Hashanah.

As I mentioned at the beginning of our service, in fact, Shabbat this week falls exactly on Tisha B’Av but our tradition is that the joyfulness, peace, thanksgiving and hope of Shabbat trumps the mourning and sadness of Tisha B’Av, so, those who observe Tisha B’Av will not begin doing so until tomorrow evening when Shabbat ends.

Just as our sacred texts for this time of year speak of existential disasters and dangers for Jerusalem in particular and the Jewish people and the Land of Israel in general ---- so this year do many of us find ourselves particularly concerned with the existential security of the State of Israel.    As I’m sure you know, an agreement among Russia, China, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, the United States and Iran was successfully concluded earlier this month.  The agreement purports to block Iran from producing nuclear weapons for fifteen years in return for the elimination of existing economic sanctions. 

Of course, all of this has everything to do with the security of the State of Israel, even though Israel was not a party to any of these talks.  That’s why I was not personally opposed when Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu accepted House Majority Leader John Boehner’s invitation to address Congress earlier this year.  The negotiations with Iran were then ongoing.  Those negotiations fundamentally impacted on Israel’s security -- yet Israel was not a party to those negotiations.  Under those circumstances it seemed to me that it was not inappropriate for Netanyahu to use the forum that he had been offered to push for his vision of what an appropriate agreement might entail.

But now the deal has been negotiated and Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khameini has given it his tacit approval.  The U.S. Congress will now have a couple of months to review it.  And the Iranian legislature will review it as well --- but not until two weeks after Congress has finished its review.  

Caution is still in order.  Reuters reported[1] last week on a televised speech that Ayatollah Khamenei gave in a Tehran mosque following the conclusion of the negotiations.  In that speech he said: 

"We have repeatedly said we don't negotiate with the U.S. on regional or international affairs; not even on bilateral issues. There are some exceptions like the nuclear programme that we negotiated with the Americans to serve our interests."  

But the Reuters article notes that he continued his remarks by asserting that U.S. policies in the region were "180 degrees" opposed to Iran's” and that,

"We will never stop supporting our friends in the region and the people of Palestine, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Bahrain and Lebanon. Even after this deal our policy towards the arrogant U.S. will not change.

Meanwhile, Reuters reports that his speech was punctuated by chants of "Death to America" and "Death to Israel".

President Obama and his advisers have acknowledged that the treaty deals with one specific problem, Iran’s path towards nuclear weapons, and that it is not any sort of holistic game changer that reforms Iran’s relationships with the world at large, let alone with Israel.

As such, it is certainly prudent to be wary about the negotiations that led up to the deal and about the current stage of the deal’s review by the U.S. Congress and by the various sectors of influence and power centers in Iranian society.

It’s easy to go into sensory overload on all of this if you try to keep up with all the news reports and analyses.   So much of it has gotten tied up with American partisan politics --- as has been true for so many issues in the United States in recent years.  One wonders whether some of those who are opposing the deal are doing so mainly because they oppose President Obama generally.  One wonders whether some of those supporting the deal are doing so mainly because they support President Obama generally.

Israeli society is split.  The American Jewish community is split.  The U.S. congress is split.  American society as a whole is split.

As for my own humble opinion, with which of course you may or may not agree, at this stage it concerns me that the deal doesn’t solve the problem of Iran’s support of terrorism and its danger to Israel in general.  It merely kicks the can down the road for ten to fifteen years.  However, it seems to me that “kicking the can down the road” is worth doing nonetheless.  The analyses I’ve read have suggested that if the U.S. and/or Israel were to attempt military action against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure that would delay Iran’s efforts to build a nuclear bomb by just two to four years.[2]  So, ten to fifteen years in my book is better than two to four years.

Beyond that level of examination, I’m no defense analyst.  And, while I did support the right of House Majority leader Boehner to invite Prime Minister Netanyahu to address Congress, and while I thought Netanyahu gave a good speech there --- I think at this point it would be counterproductive for Israel to try to influence any further the political discussion going on in Washington now. 

A fundamental tenet of Zionism, in which I wholeheartedly believe, is that the Jewish People -- as championed by the State of Israel -- should be actors in history and not just acted upon by others.  However, I found very cogent the words of Chuck Freilich, a former deputy national security adviser in Israel, who is now a senior fellow at Harvard’s Belfer Center and the author of “Zion’s Dilemmas: How Israel Makes National Security Policy.”  In the concluding paragraphs of an op-ed in the New York Times a few days ago[3] he had this to say:

Over decades, Israel has built a unique alliance with the United States. This partnership has provided Israel with extensive aid, turned the Israel Defense Forces into one of the world’s most advanced militaries and safeguarded Israel’s interests in hostile international forums. Without America, the I.D.F. would be an empty shell, and Israel would be isolated and sanctioned.

Part of being a junior ally is knowing when to say, “Enough, we have made our case, time to be a team player.” Nothing is more important for Israel’s security than the vitality of its relationship with the United States — which Israel will still need in order to deal with Iran in the future.

So much for the political analyses.  

What about our Jewish religious values?

There’s a really striking incident buried amidst the narrative of this week’s Torah portion, Parashat Devarim.  As we begin the book of Deuteronomy this week, Moses is portrayed as addressing the Israelites at the end of the forty years of wandering, just prior to the crossing of the Jordan River into the Land of Israel.  He’ll spend most of this last book of the Torah, preaching to the new generation on the importance of walking in the ways of God and creating a just and compassionate society as free people in our ancestral homeland. 

But first he reviews the history of the previous forty years.  At Deuteronomy 2:24, Moses speaks of how God had earlier instructed him: 

 

כד  קוּמוּ סְּעוּ, וְעִבְרוּ אֶת-נַחַל אַרְנֹן--רְאֵה נָתַתִּי בְיָדְךָ אֶת-סִיחֹן מֶלֶךְ-חֶשְׁבּוֹן הָאֱמֹרִי וְאֶת-אַרְצוֹ, הָחֵל רָשׁ; וְהִתְגָּר בּוֹ, מִלְחָמָה.

24 Rise up!  Set out across the wadi Arnon!  See, I give into your power Sihon the Amorite, king of Cheshbon, and his land; begin to possess it, and contend with him in battle.

 

Surprisingly, Moses seems consciously to disobey God in response.  Instead of coming out fighting, Moses recounts:

 

כו  וָאֶשְׁלַח מַלְאָכִים מִמִּדְבַּר קְדֵמוֹת, אֶל-סִיחוֹן מֶלֶךְ חֶשְׁבּוֹן, דִּבְרֵי שָׁלוֹם, לֵאמֹר.

26 And I sent messengers out of the wilderness of Kedemoth unto Sihon king of Heshbon with words of peace, saying:

כז  אֶעְבְּרָה בְאַרְצֶךָ, בַּדֶּרֶךְ בַּדֶּרֶךְ אֵלֵךְ:  לֹא אָסוּר, יָמִין וּשְׂמֹאול.

27 'Let me pass through thy land; I will go along by the highway, I will neither turn unto the right hand nor to the left.

כח  אֹכֶל בַּכֶּסֶף תַּשְׁבִּרֵנִי וְאָכַלְתִּי, וּמַיִם בַּכֶּסֶף תִּתֶּן-לִי וְשָׁתִיתִי; רַק, אֶעְבְּרָה בְרַגְלָי.

28 Thou shalt sell me food for money, that I may eat; and give me water for money, that I may drink; only let me pass through on my feet;

 

Moshe’s divergence from God’s instructions reflects another teaching in the Torah that doesn’t get explicitly expressed until later in Deuteronomy:

 

י  כִּי-תִקְרַב אֶל-עִיר, לְהִלָּחֵם עָלֶיהָ--וְקָרָאתָ אֵלֶיהָ, לְשָׁלוֹם.

10 When you approach a city to fight against it, you shall offer terms of peace.

(Deut. 20:10)

And Psalm 34 is more adamant about this point.  The psalmist declares (at Ps. 34:15):

 

בַּקֵּשׁ שָׁלוֹם וְרָדְפֵהוּ.

Bakesh shalom v’rodfeihu/ Seek peace, and pursue it.

Be a “Rodef Shalom” --- “One who pursues and chases after the possibility of Shalom.  One who does not rush to military solutions if there is even a chance that diplomacy will be more productive.

It’s certainly possible to be thoroughly cynical about the motivations of politicians or generals or pundits.  However, call me naïve, but I’ve always believed that we should “dan lechaf zechut” as it says in Pirke Avot 1:6 – which, roughly translated, means to “give people the benefit of the doubt” as to their honest intentions.

Whichever side of this particular debate on the Iran nuclear deal you find yourself, I’d suggest starting from the premise that peaceful diplomacy is always -- all things being equal -- the more moral, more Jewish, more humane path to follow.

I don’t think that anyone opposing the Iran deal would disagree with that claim.

The more focused question is, considering all the factors -- and since all things are not equal --what is the more productive path right now with respect to this particular case?

What do you think?

Shabbat shalom.

 

(c) Rabbi David Steinberg 5775/2015

 

[1]  http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/07/18/iran-nuclear-khamenei-idINKCN0PS05120150718 

[2] See, e.g., http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-01/bunker-buster-bomb-no-sure-way-to-stop-iran-if-negotiations-fail

[3] http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/20/opinion/a-good-deal-for-israel.html

Posted on April 13, 2016 .

REMARKS AT A PRAYER VIGIL FOR CHARLESTON SHOOTING

Originally posted Friday, July 3rd, 2015

[I delivered these brief remarks on Monday 6/22/15.]

We gather today at St. Mark’s AME Church, a sibling congregation to Mother Emmanuel AME Church in Charleston.  All of us, no matter what congregation or denomination or religion we identify with, as well as those of us who profess to no religion — are united in our outrage and our despair.  Nine righteous African-American individuals were murdered in an act of White Supremacist Terrorism last week. 

I was invited as a local clergy person to offer words of comfort.  And, indeed, In Judaism honoring the dead and comforting the bereaved are the two prime values informing our religious practices in times of loss.

However, in the classic Jewish text “Pirke Avot” (4:23) we are taught

ואל תנחמנו בשעה שמתו מוטל לפניו / ve’al tenachameyhu be’sha’ah she-meyto mutual lefanav (“Do not attempt to comfort someone while their dead lies before them”)

In Judaism, this teaching is connected with the idea that formal mourning does not begin until the responsibility of eulogizing and burying the dead has been fulfilled.

As we gather here today, the funerals have not yet taken place and the dead have not yet been buried.

Our hearts are still broken.  It’s too early for comfort. 

When will we learn that all humanity is one and that – whatever our background or whatever the color or our skin – each person is created בְּצֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים / btzelem Elohim  (“in the image of God”) (Gen. 1:27)?

The prophets spoke of future days of universal peace, justice and compassion.

For us in the meantime, in this as yet unredeemed world, the words of the late Israeli poet Yehuda Amichai resonate:

Don’t stop after beating the swords

into plowshares, don’t stop! Go on beating

and make musical instruments out of them.

Whoever wants to make war again

will have to turn them into plowshares first.[1]

 

Amen.

 

[1]  An Appendix to the Vision of Peace/ Tosefet Lahazon Hashalom, Yehuda Amichai (translated by Glenda Abramson and Tudor Parfitt), p. 777, Kol Haneshemah: Shabbat Vehagim (Wyncote, PA: The Reconstructionist Press, 1996)

Posted on April 13, 2016 .

DON'T LOOK!

Originally posted Friday, May 27th, 2015

(Dvar Torah for Shabbat Bemidbar)

Numbers 1:1 – 4:20

[a revised version of a dvar torah I gave at Temple Israel on Friday, May 22, 2015]

...............................................................

This week we begin Sefer Bemidbar/ The Book of Numbers – the fourth of the five books of the Torah.  The Hebrew names of all the books of the Torah (and indeed of all the weekly Torah portions) comes from the first unique word in the section.  Bemidbar is shorthand for “Bemidbar Sinai”/ “The Wilderness of Sinai” --- The first few words of the first verse being:

 ---  וַיְדַבֵּר יְהוָה אֶל-מֹשֶׁה בְּמִדְבַּר סִינַי, בְּאֹהֶל מוֹעֵד 

(“Vayedaber Adonai el Moshe bemidbar Sinai, be’ohel mo’ed…/ “Adonai spoke to Moses in the Wilderness of Sinai, in the Tent of Meeting...”)

The English title, “Numbers,” of course refers to the several censuses of the Israelites that are carried out, especially in the opening chapters of the book. That theme is also reflected in the alternative name for the book that become popular in the rabbinic period: “Chumash Hapekudim.”  “Pekudim” means “countings” and refers to taking a census.  

This week’s Torah portion – and the Book of Numbers as a whole – opens with a general census which explicitly excludes the Levites.  As we read in Numbers 1: 49-50 –

מט אַךְ אֶת-מַטֵּה לֵוִי לֹא תִפְקֹד, וְאֶת-רֹאשָׁם לֹא תִשָּׂא, בְּתוֹךְ, בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל.  נ וְאַתָּה הַפְקֵד אֶת-הַלְוִיִּם עַל-מִשְׁכַּן הָעֵדֻת וְעַל כָּל-כֵּלָיו, וְעַל כָּל-אֲשֶׁר-לוֹ--הֵמָּה יִשְׂאוּ אֶת-הַמִּשְׁכָּן וְאֶת-כָּל-כֵּלָיו, וְהֵם יְשָׁרְתֻהוּ; וְסָבִיב לַמִּשְׁכָּן, יַחֲנוּ. 

49 But you shall not count the tribe of Levi and you shall not take a census of them among the Israelites. 50 And you shall appoint the Levites over the Tabernacle of the Testimony, all its furnishings, and everything that pertains to it: they shall carry the Tabernacle and all its furnishings, and they shall tend it; and they shall camp around the Tabernacle.

Towards the end of the parasha, in chapter 4 of the Book of Numbers, a second census is taken, this time of just the Levites.  The tribe of Levi consists of three clans --- the Kohathites, the Gershonites, and the Merrarites – each of whom are to be counted separately because each clan will have different duties in the oversight of the Tabernacle. 

Moses and Aaron are themselves Kohathites, but Moses, Aaron and Aaron’s sons are treated separately from the rest of the Kohathites because of their special role as kohanim or priests.

The census of the Kohathite clan has a prominent place, since it forms the conclusion of our Torah portion.  We don’t get to the countings of the other two Levite clans --- the Gershonites and the Merrarites – until next week’s Torah reading of Parashat Naso.

The particular job of the Kohathites is to carry on their shoulders all of the most holy objects in the Israelite camp whenever the camp would journey onwards.  This includes the ark, and the tablets within the ark, and furniture and utensils used in the rituals of the Tabernacle.

Earlier, the text had specified that the Kohathites don’t start transporting those holy objects until after Aaron and his son have dismantled them and wrapped them up.

And now, in the very last verses of the parasha, Numbers 4: 17-19 --- we get a couple of portentous warnings:

17 Adonai spoke to Moses and Aaron, saying: 18 Do not let the group of Kohathite clans be cut off from among [the rest of] the Levites. 19 Do this with them, that they may live and not die when they approach the most sacred objects: let Aaron and his sons go in and assign each of them to his duties and to his porterage. 20 But let not [the Kohathites] go inside and witness the dismantling of the sanctuary, lest they die.

We should first note here that the Hebrew phrase in Numbers 4:20 --- כְּבַלַּע אֶת-הַקֹּדֶשׁ (“kevala et hakodesh”) – translated in Plaut/JPS as “the dismantling of the sanctuary” could more literally be translated as “the swallowing up of the Holy.”  Others translate the verb in this context as “cover up” or “wrap up.”

What’s going on here?  Why can’t the Kohathites look at the holy objects while they are being dismantled or covered or wrapped or swallowed up?  Why is it critical that Moses and Aaron take special care to make sure that the Kohathites don’t get “cut off” from the rest of their fellow Levites?

Traditional and contemporary commentators offer various explanations.  However, for me, the view of the 19th century German commentator Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch resonates most strongly.

Rabbi Hirsch, writing in his Torah commentary offers this explanation:

“If we are not in error, the intent of this prohibition is that the sacred things should remain to their bearers ideational concepts, not objects of physical perception, so that these individuals should be inspired all the more by the ideals the objects represent.  The spiritual contemplation of the sacred objects entrusted to the care of the Kehathites would seem to be an essential aspect of their duties, and a physical perception of these objects while they are being covered would distract the Kehathites from their spiritual contemplation and thereby in effect desecrate the objects themselves.”  [1]

If I might put this into my own words, I think what the Torah and Rabbi Hirsch are talking about is the danger of cynicism when one is too much of an “insider.”

The Kohathites might metaphorically “die” in the sense of being spiritually disillusioned by seeing the holy objects swallowed up or in a state of disarray.  Sort of like Dorothy in the Wizard of OZ peeking behind the curtain and seeing just an ordinary person playing with sound effects. 

If your passion is music, maybe you might get disillusioned by getting too much of an insider’s view of the business side of contract negotiations and labor disputes.

If you’re a legislator you might get disillusioned by the messy “sausage making” deals involved in passing laws.

If you’re a clergyperson you might get disillusioned by congregational politics.

If you’re a school teacher or academic you might get disillusioned by turf wars and budget battles.     

I think what the Torah is saying is that we need to safeguard our idealism through our own conscious efforts to avoid cynicism. In this sense, we are like the Kohathites of old. At the same time, we hope to be shielded from cynicism by the support and mentorship of others who can help protect us from disillusionment.  Such was the role of Moses, Aaron and Aaron’s sons with respect to the Kohathites.  In this sense, we are like Moses, Aaron and Aaron’s sons for those who look to us for mentorship.

Ideals are by definition illusory in the sense that they are not yet reality.  Let us retain those ideals, guard ourselves and others from cynicism, and not be cut off.

For disillusionment and cynicism is death. 

And we are a people who are called upon to choose life. 

Shabbat shalom.

 

© Rabbi David Steinberg 5775/2015

 

[1] (The Hirsch Commentary, edited by Ephraim Oratz, translated from the original German by Gertrude Hirschler, New York, The Judaica Press, 1986, p. 526) 

Posted on April 13, 2016 .

JE NE SUIS PAS CHARLIE

Originally posted Friday, January 16th, 2015

Like many people at home and around the world, I'm still processing the tumultuous events that occurred in France in recent days. 

On Wednesday, January 7, two French-born Islamist terrorists attacked the Paris offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.  They killed 12 people that day, including a police officer who was Muslim.  The terrorists purported to be acting out of religious motivation in response to the magazine having published cartoon depictions of the Muslim prophet Mohammed.  Another terrorist who was a friend of the first two, murdered another police officer on Thursday.  Then on Friday, the terrorist who had murdered the police officer on Thursday proceeded to attack Hyper Cacher, a kosher supermarket in eastern Paris.  Four customers, all Jews shopping in preparation for Shabbat, were gunned down by that terrorist.  Other hostages managed to escape to safety.  Other hostages were able to remain hidden on the scene thanks to the heroic efforts of a Muslim employee of the kosher market, who also assisted the police in their successful efforts to end the siege and kill the terrorist.  Meanwhile, the other two terrorists who had attacked the Charlie Hebdo offices were also killed by police.

On Friday evening, the Grand Synagogue in Paris cancelled services for the first time since World War II out of security concerns.

On Sunday afternoon, more than a million demonstrators, including many world leaders, marched through Paris in a show of solidarity --- French citizens and foreigners, Muslims, Jews, Christians and Atheists.  They were there at the urging of the French president Francois Hollande in support of French national ideals of freedom of speech and national solidarity.  They marched in opposition to violent religious extremism.  They marched in support of the French Jewish community that had been subject to attack.  And they marched in support of the vast majority of the French Muslim community who find themselves subject to backlash from those who would unfairly link them to the radicalized terrorist extremists who bring shame upon Islam while claiming to represent it.

And then on Sunday evening, a memorial service for all the victims took place at the Grand Synagogue, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a featured speaker.

The Charlie Hebdo attack reminds us that the exercise of freedom of speech should not be impeded by threats or acts of terrorism.  This doesn’t mean that one has to believe that the magazine was wise or thoughtful to print (and to continue to print) cartoons that are intentionally designed to offend religious sensibilities.   In that regard, I can say for myself “Je ne suis pas Charlie” (“I am not Charlie”). 

But it does mean that those who would carry out such attacks threaten the civilized world and must be reined in. 

And the Hyper Cacher attack reminds us that violent anti-Semitism still exists in the world and that vigilance is required against it.  

Even though I’m generally not much of a fan of the current Israeli government, I was still very moved at the sight of Prime Minister Netanyahu speaking at the Grand Synagogue in Paris on Sunday night.  Reminding all of us that no matter what might happen in France or in any place in the world where we might live, that we have a home in the State of Israel, which is the fulfillment of the historical national aspirations of the Jewish people.

This is a good opportunity to highlight that we are currently in the election season for the 37th World Zionist Congress, which will meet in Jerusalem in fall of 2015.  The first Zionist Congress was convened by Theodore Herzl in 1897.  Prior to 1948, these Congresses were concerned with establishing a Jewish homeland in Eretz Yisra’el (“The land of Israel”).  Since 1948, these Congresses have been the official venue for world Jewry to help shape the vision and priorities of Medinat Yisra’el (“The State of Israel”).

For more information about the current elections, you might wish to read the recent article by J.J. Goldberg in the Forward, which can be found here:  http://forward.com/articles/212347/the-zionist-election-you-can-participate-in-if-y/

The American delegation in the World Zionist Congress holds 145 out of the 500 seats. Israel receives 190, allocated by Knesset election results. The rest of the world shares the other 165.

A number of American Zionist organizations are presenting delegate slates representing a spectrum of religious and political positions.  Both of the movements with which Temple Israel is affiliated, the Union for Reform Judaism and Jewish Reconstructionist Communities, officially encourage all of us who are eligible to vote in the Zionist elections to vote for the slate put forward by ARZA, the Association of Reform Zionists of America.  The ARZA platform for the World Zionist Congress advocates for gender equality in Israel, religious equality in Israel for all streams of Judaism, and the pursuit of peace through a commitment to a two-state solution.  More information, including voting instructions, can be found at the Reform movement website at https://www.reformjews4israel.org/ or at the Reconstructionist movement site at http://www.jewishrecon.org/resource/vote-give-reconstructionist-views-and-values-voice-israeli-society-today

As Jews, we are part of a global, multicultural, multiracial people with Israel as our spiritual center and homeland.  While we demand and deserve to be free to live as equal citizens in all nations including the United States of America, we dare not forsake our connection with the land of our people’s birth and rebirth.  

We stand in solidarity with our fellow Jews in France, in Israel and around the world.

And we stand in solidarity with those of all religions -- and those of no religion -- who believe in peace and mutual respect among all humanity.

L’shalom,

Rabbi David Steinberg
rabbidavid@jewishduluth.org

Posted on April 13, 2016 .

CHANUKAH REFLECTIONS

A short kavanah (intention setting) that appears in Siddur Sha’ar Zahav greatly resonates with me during this Chanukah season:

“In times of darkness, people have always kndled light – to remove the gloom of ignorance, to chase away the clouds of doubt, and to overcome the fear of oppression.  We, too, come together to kindle light: the symbol of our prayers for peace, for hope, for freedom, and for blessings for ourselves and for the entire world.” [1]

I think that this basic truth explains the endurance and magic of the eight days of Chanukah.

Much more than gift giving. For, as our tradition teaches – “Azehu Ashir? Hasame’ach bechelko.” -   “Who is rich?  The one who is happy with his or her lot.”  (Pirke Avot 4:1)

Much more than militaristic victory celebrations.  For, as our tradition teaches – “Azehu gibor – Hakovesh et yitzro”  --   “Who is strong? The one who has impulse control. For one who is slow to anger is better than one who is strong; and one who rules one’s own spirit is better than better than one who conquers a city.” (Ibid.)

But lighting candles in the face of darkness symbolizes courage, faith and hope. And increasing the light with each night of Chanukah, reminds us to have optimism in the future.  As the Talmud teaches --- וטעמא דבית הלל דמעלין בקדש ואין מורידין  -- “Bet Hillel’s reasoning was that in matters of holiness we ascend rather than descend.”  (Shabbat 21b)

There’s a modern Israeli Chanukah song that I love that goes –

Banu choshech legaresh /Biyadeinu ohr va’esh /Kol echad hu ohr katan /Vekulanu ohr eitan. /Surah choshech hal’ah shchor./ Surah mip’nei ha’ohr. 

We come to chase the darkness away. In our hands are light and fire. Each person is a small light.  But together we are a mighty light.  Turn away O Darkness. Turn away in the face of the light. 

I once heard it taught that the miracle of Chanukah was not that the single jar of oil lasted for eight days, but rather, that we had the courage to light it without knowing whether it could last.

So it is with our lives:  Faith, community and tradition can give us the strength to push ahead even when we can’t predict what the future may hold.

Whatever challenges we face individually or communally -- May we all be blessed with the capacity to focus our hearts and minds on the light of gratitude – and to banish from ourselves the darkness of cynicism and despair.

Surah choshech mipnei ha’or – Turn away o darkness in the face of the light.

Chag Urim Sameach/ Happy Chanukah!

Posted on April 13, 2016 .

CHILDREN OF JOSEPH

Dvar Torah for Temple Israel Annual Meeting on Sunday, December 14, 2014

We traditionally refer to ourselves as “Ahm Yisra’el” (the people of Israel) or "Bnei Yisra’el" (the children of Israel) --- or simply “Israel”.  And, of course, that’s the name of our congregation as well:  Temple Israel.  Israel, as we know, is the name given to Jacob by God after he wrestles with the angel in Genesis 32:29.  There the angel declares:   לֹא יַעֲקֹב יֵאָמֵר עוֹד שִׁמְךָ--כִּי, אִם-יִשְׂרָאֵל:  כִּי-שָׂרִיתָ עִם-אֱלֹהִים וְעִם-אֲנָשִׁים, וַתּוּכָל.  ("Your name shall no longer be Jacob, but Israel ["yisra'el"] , for you have striven ["saritah"] with beings divine ["elohim"] and human, and have prevailed.")

This idea of striving, struggling, wrestling with issues both philosophical and practical is indeed an important characteristic of Jewish life. 

However, during this time of year when our Torah reading cycle features the story of Joseph, I often feel that Ahm Yosef  ("the people of Joseph") might be an even better name for us.  The Torah teaches that various patriarchs and matriarchs prior to Joseph experience God directly and explicitly.  Indeed the same claim is made for Adam and Eve and Noah before them.  God speaks to them and appears to them directly.

Joseph, on the other hand, is more like us.  God never addresses him directly. And yet, Joseph models for us the religious behavior of a much later age:  He doesn’t experience direct, unmediated revelation.  Yet he understands that God’s presence is reflected in the visicitudes of his life.  In this week’s Torah portion, Miketz, when he interprets Pharaoh’s dreams he insists the dreams and the interpretations ultimately come from God (see Gen. 41:25) .  And when, in next week’s Torah portion, Vayigash, he and his brothers are finally reunited, Joseph forgives them for having sold him into slavery, asserting that it was ultimately God who sent him ahead of them to Egypt in order to be able to save lives. (see Gen. 45: 5-8)

So to with our lives:  We each have our ups and downs, our joys and our heartbreaks,  and it’s easy to succumb to despair at the seeming meaningless and randomness of it all.  But, following the lead of Yosef Ha-Tzadik ("Joseph the Righteous"), our Jewish tradition teaches us to look for God’s presence, to look for meaning, to look for a bigger picture. 

When in our Temple’s mission statement we see that Temple Israel is to be " a center for Jewish life" --that’s an important part of that mission: providing opportunities --  through worship, study, social action and communal camaraderie--- to experience the Divine that infuses the everyday.

One more teaching I’d like to share about this week’s Parasha.  In the very last verse of Parashat Miketz (Gen. 44:17) Joseph sends his brothers off to return to Jacob telling them “Alu leshalom el avichem” (literally, "Go up towards peace to your father.")

By contrast, in Genesis 1515, Abraham is promised by God that he would die and be buried “beshalom” ("in peace").

Of the contrast between the phrase “lekh beshalom” (go in peace) verses “lekh leshalom” (go towards peace) the Talmud, citing a couple of other biblical verses, teaches:

ואמר רבי אבין הלוי הנפטר מחברו אל יאמר לו לך בשלום אלא לך לשלום שהרי יתרו שאמר לו למשה (שמות ד) לך לשלום עלה והצליח דוד שאמר לו לאבשלום (שמואל ב טו) לך בשלום הלך ונתלה:  ואמר רבי אבין הלוי הנפטר מן המת אל יאמר לו לך לשלום אלא לך בשלום שנאמר (בראשית טו) ואתה תבא אל אבותיך בשלום: 

R. Abin the Levite also said: When a man takes leave of his fellow, he should not say to him, 'Go in peace' (lekh beshalom), but 'Go to peace' (lekh leshalom). For Moses, to whom Jethro said, Go to peace, (Ex. 4:18) went up and prospered, whereas Absalom to whom David said, Go in peace, (2 Samuel 15:9) went away and was hung. R. Abin the Levite also said: One who takes leave of the dead [upon leaving a funeral procession] should not say to him 'Go to peace', but 'Go in peace', as it says, But thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace. (Gen. 15:15)

May our incoming board and the congregation as a whole lekh leshalom/ go towards peace – towards increasing fulfillment, fellowship and vitality in the year to come.

Amen.

Posted on April 13, 2016 .

TAKING IT TO THE STREETS

Sermon for Yom Kippur Morning 5775

October 4, 2014

 

I spoke last night about how Yom Kippur is called Shabbat Shabbaton --- literally a Sabbath of Sabbaths or a cessation of cessations.  Calling for us to stop dead in our tracks and take stock of the state of our souls.

But what about the rest of the week?

What about the rest of the year?

That’s when we carry our values out into the world.

The prophet Hosea describes the relationship between God and the collectivity of the Jewish people as that of a married couple.  There may have been times of estrangement, times of distance, but there is reconciliation at the end when God, as it were, declares:

 

כא  וְאֵרַשְׂתִּיךְ לִי, לְעוֹלָם; וְאֵרַשְׂתִּיךְ לִי בְּצֶדֶק וּבְמִשְׁפָּט, וּבְחֶסֶד וּבְרַחֲמִים.

21 I will espouse you to Me forever; I will espouse you to Me with righteousness and with justice, and with kindness and with compassion.

כב  וְאֵרַשְׂתִּיךְ לִי, בֶּאֱמוּנָה; וְיָדַעַתְּ, אֶת-יְהוָה. 

22 And I will espouse you to ME with faithfulness; and you shall know the Eternal.

We see here the purpose of such qualities as tzedek/righteousness, mishpat/justice, chesed/kindness and rachamim/compassion.  It is by means of exercising these qualities that we get to have communion with God; that we get to know God.

Moses gets a similar lesson when he pleads with God: הַרְאֵנִי נָא, אֶת-כְּבֹדֶךָ / Show me your Glory! (or as the Jewish Publication Society translates it): “Oh, let me behold your Presence!”  (Ex. 33:18).

And God responds that no human can understand God’s fundamental essence but what we can understand is God’s attributes. 

God is compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, extending kindness, forgiving iniquity and transgression.  (See Ex. 34: 6-8).

The implication is that we should do likewise.

More explicitly, in Deuteronomy 13:5, Moses charges the people אַחֲרֵי יְהוָה אֱלֹהֵיכֶם תֵּלֵכוּ / “You shall walk after your God”

And the Talmud, in Tractate Sotah, deals with the question of how to do so:

R. Hama son of R. Hanina further said: What means the text: "You shall walk after your God" (Deuteronomy 13)? Is it, then, possible for a human being to walk after God; for has it not been said: "For God is a devouring fire" (Deuteronomy 4)? But [the meaning is] to walk after the attributes of the Holy One. Just as God clothes the naked, as it says, "And God made garments of skins for Adam and his wife, and clothed them" (Genesis 3), so do you also clothe the naked. The Holy One, blessed be God, visited the sick, for it is written: "And God appeared to him by the oaks of Mamre" (Genesis 18), so do you also visit the sick. The Holy One, blessed be God, comforted mourners, for it is written: "And it came to pass after the death of Abraham, that God blessed Isaac his son" (Genesis 25), so do you also comfort mourners. The Holy one, blessed be God, buried the dead, for it is written: "And [God] buried him in the valley" (Deuteronomy 34), so do you also bury the dead.

And, of course, in Isaiah, in the haftarah that Ben chanted so beautifully this morning, the theme is stated even more strongly --- our fasting and our prayers and our worship on this Sabbath of Sabbaths are important – but they must be matched by our sense of justice and compassion for others. 

Our fasting this day – and by extension all of our ritual practices this day – are pointless if, in the words of the haftarah, “on the day of your fast you are preoccupied with your possessions and oppress those who toil on your behalf!” (Isa. 58:3)

And as our own stomachs are growling from our Yom Kippur fast, the haftarah challenges us:

6 Is this not the fast I desire?!
To unlock the fetters of wickedness,
And untie the cords of the yoke
To let the oppressed go free;
To break off every yoke.
7 Is it not to share your bread with the hungry,
And to take the wretched poor into your home;
When you see the naked, to clothe him,
And not to ignore your own kin?!

That, of course, is what our response must be – at the local level, at the national level and at the international level.  Our politicians often speak about the middle class-- but I’m always looking for them to speak about the poor.

Depending on where each of us are on the American political spectrum, we may have various ideas regarding how much of this religious obligation of caring for the poor should be borne by government and how much should be borne by individuals. 

But, realistically, I can’t conceive of a way in which our religious obligations to:

Feed the hungry,

House the homeless,

Clothe the naked

Free the oppressed

Can be borne by government alone or by charitable organizations alone, or by individuals alone.  We have to do it together.

On the local level, that’s why CHUM – which describes itself as “people of faith working together to provide basic necessities, foster stable lives, and organize for a just and compassionate community” works on all these fronts:  lobbying governmental entities on behalf of the needs of the poor; providing services through the work of its own professional staff and community of volunteers, and raising funds from individuals and congregations to fund its work.  And that’s why Temple Israel is a member congregation of CHUM.

In your Yom Kippur program booklet there is a flyer about the Steve 0’Neil Apartments, which consists of 44 permanent supportive housing units as well as six emergency shelter units for long term homeless families that are being built on the northwest corner of Fourth Street and First Avenue West. 

There is much we can do as individual members of Temple Israel and as a congregation to take part in this CHUM initiative.  The flyer gives you information about how to donate to the “Community Housewarming Registry” for the purpose of stocking the new Steve O’Neill Community apartments with basic essentials.

In my recent conversations with CHUM Executive Director Lee Stuart and CHUM congregational outreach and volunteer coordinator Courtney Cochran, I’ve also learned that they are looking for volunteers in a number of different capacities to get involved in the “CHUM Families Connection” network.  For example:  Helping a family move into a new apartment;  helping drive families to appointments, school or shopping;  helping to run monthly birthday parties for kids living in the Steve O’Neill Apartments; Helping with child care needs;  etc.  Any of these opportunities would come with step-by-step guidance by CHUM staff.  Let’s do this!  See me if you have any ideas about how we can establish an organized presence from our congregation in these efforts.

Meanwhile, another way Temple members can help in the community is by taking part in a home rehabilitation project for a needy family through Habitat for Humanity.  We’ve been doing this during Sukkot week for the past few years, and this year will be no exception.  Please see Tom Griggs if you would like to take part in this year’s work day to take place a week from Tuesday, when we will join together with volunteers from Glen Avon Presbyterian Church.

And once again, the envelopes from MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger and the shopping bags for the food shelf are here on your seats to remind us of how we can respond to the words of the haftarah.

Donate to the food shelf.

Donate to MAZON.

Donate to the Jewish Federation

Donate to American Jewish World Service.

Donate to the charity of your choice.

Vote for political candidates who you believe will be most focused on establishing and maintaining a just and compassionate society.

I read earlier this week a neat little dvar torah by Rabbi Shlomo Riskin that touches on these themes.  He notes that the closing service of Yom Kippur is called “Ne’ilah” a word which means “locking” and refers to the metaphor of the “closing of gates.”  And that the typical interpretation we might have is something along the lines of “Don’t lock me out!  Don’t close the doors or the gates in my face as long as there is still time, let me come in.”

But Rabbi Riskin suggests that instead when we get to Ne’ilah a few hours from now we should really be crying out --- “Don’t lock me in!”  Because --- after the many hours that we will have spent during these High Holy Days focusing on cheshbon hanefesh/ personal inventory and teshuvah/repentance and tefilah/prayer are done --- the next step is to “take it to the streets!” 

We literally do so when we leave the solidity of our homes to dwell in the fragile sukkah and when we experience the texture and fragrance of the arba minim – the four species of etrog, lulav, myrtle and willow.

But we also --- literally – do it by responding to the prophetic call to

unlock the fetters of wickedness,
And untie the cords of the yoke
To let the oppressed go free;
To break off every yoke.
… to share our bread with the hungry,
And to take the wretched poor into our home;
… to provide clothes for those in need
In short, “not to ignore our neighbor”

It’s all very daunting. But the important thing is simply to get involved in the effort.  For it is not upon us to complete the work, but neither are we free to absent ourselves from it.

That is the message of this day.

Gmar Chatimah Tovah ve-Shabbat shalom.

 

(c) Rabbi David Steinberg

October 2014/ Yom Kippur 5775

Posted on April 13, 2016 .

FULL STOP

Sermon for Kol Nidre Night 5775

October 3, 2014

In the Torah, in Leviticus 23:27, the holiday we now call Yom Kippur/ Day of Atonement is called Yom Hakipurim/ Day of the Atonements (plural).  According to the medieval Spanish Jewish commentator Isaac Abarbanel (1437-1508), the plural “kippurim” refers to the fact that on this particular day each year transgressions from throughout the year would be expiated during the course of the rituals carried out by the Kohen Gadol/ High Priest.  This plural version of the name of this holiday gives rise to a classic pun:  The 18th century commentator known as the Vilna Ga’on interprets the phrase Yom kippurim – Day of Kippurim – Day of Atonements as Yom ki Purim.  “A day like Purim” since the prefix ki can mean “like.”[1]

Now there are entire sermons that can be built around the Vilna Ga’on’s teaching that Yom Kippur and Purim are two sides of the same coin.  Maybe I’ll do that sermon next year.  Come to think of It, I did speak of this “Yom Ki Purrim” theme last year on Kol Nidre night when I invited us to imagine Vladimir Putin in drag as Queen Esther…

(I guess you hadda be there….)

Anyway, this whole convoluted introduction is just my way of saying – I want to open with some jokes and you shouldn’t think that this is inappropriate for Kol Nidre night.

I know – I worry too much…

*****************

So……       An elderly Jewish man living in Century Village in South Florida calls his son Joshua in New York. The father says to the son, "I hate to tell you, but your mother and I can't stand each other anymore, and we are divorcing. That's it!! I want to live out the rest of my years in peace. I am telling you now, so you and your sister shouldn't go into shock later when I move out." The father hangs up, and the son immediately calls his sister Melissa in the Hamptons and tells her the news. She says, "I'll handle this." Melissa calls Florida and gets her father on the phone. She pleads to her father, "Don't do ANYTHING 'til Joshua and I get there! We will be there Friday." The father says, "All right, all right already." When the father hangs up the phone he hollers to his wife, "Okay, the kids are coming for the High Holidays!'' 

**************************** 

Rabbi to congregant: "Yes I understand that McDonalds calls it "fast food"...but you STILL can't eat it on Yom Kippur!"

********************

A friend was in front of me coming out of the Synagogue one day, and as always the Rabbi was standing at the door shaking hands as the congregation departed. He grabbed my friend by the hand and pulled him aside. The Rabbi said to him, "You need to join the Army of G-d!"

My friend replied, "I'm already in the Army of G-d, Rabbi."

Rabbi questioned, "How come I don't see you except for Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur?"

He whispered back, "I'm in the secret service."

***********************************

On Yom Kippur morning, the Rabbi noticed little Adam was staring up at the large plaque that hung in the foyer of the synagogue. It was covered with names, and small American flags were mounted on either side of it.

The seven-year old had been staring at the plaque for some time, so the Rabbi walked up, stood beside the boy, and said quietly, "Shalom, Adam."

"Shalom, Rabbi," replied the young man, still focused on the plaque. "Rabbi Resnick, what is this?" Adam asked.

"Well, it's a memorial to all the young men and women who died in the service."

Soberly, they stood together, staring at the large plaque. Little Adam's voice was barely audible when he asked: "Which service? Shacharit, Mincha or Ma’ariv?"

******************

I really was just aiming for that last joke…

Because, all kidding aside, this idea of “dying in the service” does have some background to it.  For it is indeed true that some of the customs of Yom Kippur are meant to make it feel like a dress rehearsal for our own death.  The kittel that I’m wearing is reminiscent of “tachrichim” the shrouds in which Jews are traditionally buried.  The rejection of food and drink and other creature comforts points to the time when our souls will no longer inhabit these earthly bodies of ours.  The “vidui” or confession of sins that we recite in synagogue on Yom Kippur has its parallel in the “vidui” prayer that is traditionally recited by or on behalf of someone who is near the point of death.

We confront our mortality ---- and we confront the state of our souls --- during this Day of Atonement. 

The word “Shabbat” literally means “cessation.”  And Torah designates Yom Kippur (in the Yom Kippur morning Torah reading) as “Shabbat Shabbaton[2]” --- Cessation of cessations --- FULL STOP….

Just like death.

This is the climax of the process of cheshbon hanefesh/soul searching that we’ve been leading up to for the past 40 days, since the 1st day of the month of Elul.  Those 40 days from the 1st of Elul until the 10th of Tishri correspond to the 40 days that Moses communed with God on Mt. Sinai following the smashing of the 1st set of tablets in the wake of the incident of the Golden Calf.

Yom Kippur is a somber and serious day. 

But---- even without the warm-up jokes---- it’s not a sad day.  For, built in alongside the prayers of confession and the pleas for forgiveness, is the confidence that, indeed, we will be forgiven.

In the Song of Songs chapter 5 verse two – it says:  “I was asleep but my heart was awake. My beloved knocks! Saying --- “Pitchu li, achoti, rayati, yonati, chamati … Open up for me – O my sister, my friend, my flawless dove”. 

The rabbinic midrash on Song of Songs sees us as the sleeper and God as the one who knocks, interpreting the verse thus:

Amar Hakadosh Barukh Hu le-yisra’el: Pitchu li petach echad shel teshuvah ke-chudah shel machat --- The Blessed holy one said to Israel“My children, show me an opening of repentance no larger than the eye of a needle, and I will widen it into openings through which wagons and carriages can pass”[3]

That’s how the system works.

And with the long blast of the Shofar at the end of Yom Kippur, we are, as it were, reborn --- hopefully a bit wiser, a bit more compassionate, a bit more faithful than we may have been when we entered this day in the company of our fellow sinners. 

****************

Yom Kippur --- “Shabbat Shabbaton” --- Cessation of cessations --- FULL STOP….

We certainly need these pauses, these way stations on our life’s journeys.  Our death bed should not be the first time we take stock of our lives.  And Yom Kippur should not be the only day of the year when we pause to reflect; when we pause to give thanks. 

Our tradition teaches of doing so three times a day morning, afternoon and evening (Shacharit, Mincha and Ma’ariv).  And, more so, every time we are about to taste a morsel of food – and every time we have finished eating a meal, and every time we encounter a natural wonder of the world and every time we carry out a ritual mitzvah…  

But even if we don’t davven three times a day; and even if we don’t say 100 blessings every day --- we get the idea…..

Our lives are a collection of moments.  Moments of grace.  Moments of trial.  Moments of insight.  Moments of pleasure.  Moments of pain. 

And then they’re over. 

As it says in Psalm 103 – In words that the choir will sing tomorrow afternoon to open our Yizkor servie:

 

טו אֱנוֹשׁ, כֶּחָצִיר יָמָיו; כְּצִיץ הַשָּׂדֶה, כֵּן יָצִיץ.

15 As for the human being, our days are like grass; as a flower of the field, so do we flourish.

טז כִּי רוּחַ עָבְרָה-בּוֹ וְאֵינֶנּוּ; וְלֹא-יַכִּירֶנּוּ עוֹד מְקוֹמוֹ.

16 For the wind passes over it, and it is gone; and its place knows it no more.

This all reminds me of what I think is the best movie I’ve seen in the past few years:  Richard Linklater’s film “Boyhood.” 

Linklater and his cast of actors met for a few weeks every year for 12 years to create a film in which the main character grows from a 6 year old boy to an 18 year old young man – and we see the other characters – his sister, his parents, their friends – age as well… in real time.  Real time, that is to say, compressed into two and half seamless hours.

Spoiler alert:  For the most part there are no melodramatic cataclysms and plot reversals – and yet we are spellbound.  I was, anyway.  So much so that I saw the movie twice this summer, once when I was on vacation in London and again when I was back home in Duluth. The moral or theme of the movie seems to be just what we’ve been talking up here --- that life is made up of moments.  And that these moments can rush by before we know it. 

But we want to know it.  So we need these set times to help us acquire that knowledge.

We need that full stop.

And, now that we’re stopped – for this holiest of holy days – now that we are here observing Yom Kippur -- how shall we use this time?

In the days of the Mishkan or Tabernacle of which the Torah speaks, and in the days of the ancient Temples of which the Talmud speaks  – Yom Hakippurim was about cleaning out the accumulated ritual impurities of the sanctuary.

The Kohen Gadol wore the right clothes and said the right words, the scape goat was sent off to the wilderness bearing the people’s sins, the animals and grain offerings were offered in the proper manner and “voila”

 

ל  כִּי-בַיּוֹם הַזֶּה יְכַפֵּר עֲלֵיכֶם, לְטַהֵר אֶתְכֶם:  מִכֹּל, חַטֹּאתֵיכֶם, לִפְנֵי יְהוָה, תִּטְהָרוּ.

30 On this day atonement will be made for you, to purify you; from all your wrongs.  In the presence of Adonai shall ye be pure. [4]

A metaphorical way of viewing that Biblical conception of Yom Kippur might be to see it as about “cleaning out our spiritual shmutz, the accumulated gunk in our souls.”   

Sort of like how we go to the dentist every six months to get the plaque buildup removed.  Or how we use a cleaner app on our smartphones to clear out the junk files from our cache.

How many bad habits or destructive tendencies have we permitted to clog up our spiritual pores this past year?  May the power of this day enable us to purify ourselves.

I mentioned a moment ago that I was in London during part of my vacation this summer.  I got a lot of use out of the London Underground and, if you’ve ever been on the London Underground, you might recall that there is a ubiquitous phrase that you hear all the time on the recorded announcements and that you see posted on all the train doors: 

“Mind the Gap!”

I think that’s a good way of describing how the meaning of the Day of Atonement evolved from the “Yom Hakippurim” of the Biblical period to the “Yom Kippur” of susbsequent centuries.

Originally, kaparah/atonement was about cleaning out the shmutz –which, as we’ve just mentioned still does have resonance today even after the destruction of the second Temple so many centuries ago.

But it was in the rabbinic period, the period of the Talmud, that Judaism expanded upon the concept of Teshuvah/Repentance/Return as the major theme of not just Yom Kippur but of the enter High Holiday season.

What is teshuvah?  It’s about responding to that urgent message:

MIND THE GAP

That gap/ that distance between the subway car and the station platform can be treacherous.

And so can that gap/ that distance between ourselves and God – or, if you prefer – that gap between how we are living our lives and how we know in our hearts we should be living our lives.

Our consciences, informed by our Jewish values, prompt us to mind the gap, to come to a full stop, to reflect upon how we might close the distance.

To complete the passage from Psalm 103 that the choir will sing tomorrow at Yizkor:

Yes --

טו אֱנוֹשׁ, כֶּחָצִיר יָמָיו; כְּצִיץ הַשָּׂדֶה, כֵּן יָצִיץ.

15 As for the human being, our days are like grass; as a flower of the field, so do we flourish

טז כִּי רוּחַ עָבְרָה-בּוֹ וְאֵינֶנּוּ; וְלֹא-יַכִּירֶנּוּ עוֹד מְקוֹמוֹ.

16 For the wind passes over it, and it is gone; and its place knows it no more.

But ---

יז וְחֶסֶד יְהוָה, מֵעוֹלָם וְעַד-עוֹלָם-- עַל-יְרֵאָיו;
וְצִדְקָתוֹ, לִבְנֵי בָנִים.

17 [T]he steadfast love of the Eternal is from everlasting to everlasting upon those who revere the Eternal, and divine righteousness extends to all generations.

 

And here we are.

 

Tomorrow in my Yom Kippur morning sermon I plan to focus more on where we might go from here.

In the meantime,

Tzom Kal/ Have an easy fast – those of you who are able to do so.

And may each and every one of us, and the whole house of Israel, be inscribed and sealed for a good year – a year of peace and blessing not just for us but for the world at large.

Gmar Chatimah Tovah ve-Shabbat shalom.

 

(c) Rabbi David Steinberg

October 2014/ Yom Kippur 5775

 

[1] See http://www.ou.org/holidays/purim/every_day_purim_every_night_kippurim/

[2] Lev. 16:31 – Part of the main Torah reading for Yom Kippur morning.

[3] Song of Songs Rabba 5:2.2 as translated in Kol Haneshama: Machzor Leyamim Nora’im, Reconstructionist Press, 1999, p. 17.

[4]  Leviticus 16:30 (The “signature verse” introducing the Yom Kippur Amidah).

Posted on April 13, 2016 .